fbpx
Search

Trouble for .COM Trademarks

By Hoge Fenton | 12.19.2019 | Firm Post

The Supreme Court ruled in November that it will hear an appeal from the 4th Circuit brought by the USPTO. The primary issue is whether a generic term plus “.com” can function as a trademark and should be granted registration. The 4th Circuit found that such a mark could be registered where the term as a whole (BOOKING.COM) was found to not be generic and where there is survey evidence indicating that 74% of consumers identified the term as a brand. In addition, it is possible that the Court will weigh in on whether an attorney’s fees award to the PTO in a case they lost was allowable, a USPTO policy that has been recently struck down in the context of patent appeals.

Hoge Fenton Trademark attorney, Dana Brody-Brown, predicts the court will uphold the Circuit Court decision and find that, while not all generic plus “.com” names are protectable, this must be a fact-specific inquiry and, where there is evidence that consumers recognize the term in question as a brand, it should be protected as a trademark. No matter how the Supreme Court rules, the case promises to clarify the law around protection for domain names used as trademarks.

Mackrell International California Minority Counsel Program Best Places to Work 2019 Bay Area Green Business